Our Cases

The legislative innovation provided legal guarantees for the protection of the rights and interests of a person participating in a bankruptcy case from the claims of an affiliated majority creditor

Lawyers of the Magnetar Moscow Bar Association have achieved the cancellation of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of three courts in a hereditary dispute complicated by a foreign component

Risk minimization in bankruptcy proceedings

Dispute on bringing KDL to subsidiary liability

Challenging a decision of a tax authority on on-site tax audit in court

Bringing KDL to subsidiary liability in the amount of more than 200,000,000 rubles

Termination of criminal case and criminal prosecution with the imposition of a fine (paragraphs “a, b”, part 2, article 193.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Dispute regarding the invalidation of the Contract

Successful practice of applying to the ECHR on prolonged detention and providing inadequate medical services to defendant during the detention in custody

Participation in a lawsuit on the side of a security company in terms of debt collection under a contract for the provision of security services for the property complex

Opposition in the process of bringing to the secondary responsibility the controlling persons of the bankrupt enterprise

Decrease in the amount of joint recovery in bankruptcy proceedings

Protection of property rights of a Client on the recognition as invalid of the residential premises contract of donation; and the use of the consequences of the transaction invalidity

Practices on individuals’ protection from unlawful requirements of a financial manager related to challenging the purchase and sale transactions and gift of the debtor’s real estate and the reversion of this property to the bankruptcy asset

Project for the protection of individuals from unlawful claims of bankruptcy trustees to bring persons controlling the debtor to subsidiary liability for the debts of a legal entity

Recovery of a penalty for the supply of goods of inadequate quality

Disputes with the tax authority

Debt collection under the service agreement

Positive defense practice in fraud cases (under Article 159, Article 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Challenging the decision of the tax authority for cameral tax audit

Challenging the decision of the tax authority for cameral tax audit

Challenging the actions of tax officials

Challenging the decision of the tax authority on the field tax audit

Challenging the decision of the tax authority on the field tax audit

Challenging an act of a tax authority on a field tax audit

Challenging the decision of the tax authority on the field tax audit

Positive defense practice in cases of corruption (Article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Positive practice of defense in cases of tax evasion and tax levy from an organization (Article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Positive defense practice in cases of commercial bribery (Article 204 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Termination of criminal case and criminal prosecution with the imposition of a fine (paragraphs “a, b”, part 2, article 193.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Successful practice of applying to the ECHR on prolonged detention and providing inadequate medical services to defendant during the detention in custody

Positive defense practice in fraud cases (under Article 159, Article 174.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Positive defense practice in cases of corruption (Article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Positive practice of defense in cases of tax evasion and tax levy from an organization (Article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Positive defense practice in cases of commercial bribery (Article 204 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Lawyers of the Magnetar Moscow Bar Association have achieved the cancellation of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of three courts in a hereditary dispute complicated by a foreign component

Participation in a lawsuit on the side of a security company in terms of debt collection under a contract for the provision of security services for the property complex

Opposition in the process of bringing to the secondary responsibility the controlling persons of the bankrupt enterprise

Decrease in the amount of joint recovery in bankruptcy proceedings

Protection of property rights of a Client on the recognition as invalid of the residential premises contract of donation; and the use of the consequences of the transaction invalidity

Practices on individuals’ protection from unlawful requirements of a financial manager related to challenging the purchase and sale transactions and gift of the debtor’s real estate and the reversion of this property to the bankruptcy asset

Project for the protection of individuals from unlawful claims of bankruptcy trustees to bring persons controlling the debtor to subsidiary liability for the debts of a legal entity

Recovery of a penalty for the supply of goods of inadequate quality

Disputes with the tax authority

Debt collection under the service agreement

Challenging a decision of a tax authority on on-site tax audit in court

Challenging the decision of the tax authority for cameral tax audit

Challenging the decision of the tax authority for cameral tax audit

Challenging the actions of tax officials

Challenging the decision of the tax authority on the field tax audit

Challenging the decision of the tax authority on the field tax audit

Challenging an act of a tax authority on a field tax audit

Challenging the decision of the tax authority on the field tax audit

The legislative innovation provided legal guarantees for the protection of the rights and interests of a person participating in a bankruptcy case from the claims of an affiliated majority creditor

Risk minimization in bankruptcy proceedings

Dispute on bringing KDL to subsidiary liability

Bringing KDL to subsidiary liability in the amount of more than 200,000,000 rubles

Dispute regarding the invalidation of the Contract