Staff development is testimony to the vision of management and its business wisdom.
A company that invests in employee training can, a priori, be considered stable, successful, investing not only in short-term, but also in long-term projects.
A lawyer is obliged to constantly improve his knowledge and improve his qualifications, says Art.7 of the Federal Law “On advocacy and law practice in the Russian Federation“.
March 1, 2019 in the framework of the training of employees of the “MAGNETAR” Group of Companies, a presentation was held on the theme “Successful appeal to the ECHR from theory to practice”, reporter and lawyer of the Civil law department Nikita
Andreyevich Trifonov.
The main topics that Trifonov Nikita raised in his speech:
- Recent trends in the European Court of Justice (as of December 2018).
Statistics on the number of complaints received from the Russian Federation, broken down by category of violations (freedom of assembly, access to court, inhuman treatment, detention in detention facilities).
- Admissibility criteria: general rules that must be followed when filing a complaint with the ECHR.
- The procedure for the consideration of complaints by the ECHR (single judge, a committee of three judges, the Chamber (7 judges), the Grand Chamber (17 judges), communication, etc.). In what composition and in what order are the proceedings carried out. What acts can the Court take and when, what measures can be indicated by the Court in the acts adopted.
- The order of execution of judgments of the ECHR.
- The role of the Council of Ministers in overseeing the execution of resolutions, what mechanisms are used in this case.
In sufficient detail, the speaker announced the criteria for admissibility of the complaint: substantive, procedural, jurisdictional. After all, the majority of complaints (90%) are eliminated without going through the filtration department of the Court, due to a formal non-compliance with the conditions of admissibility. This may be an incorrect filling out of the form, a violation of the 6-month period for appeal, or the exhaustion of national remedies.
